Chapter 3

Ionization Potentials of Cold Silver Clusters

Introduction
Mass Spectra
Ionization Potential Determination
Discussion of IP's: Comparison to Au, Ni, Nb


Introduction

Among metal clusters, the understanding of size dependent electronic structure effects is most extensive for small alkalis because of their experimental and theoretical tractability. Many experiments have probed the properties of alkali metal clusters.18 19 In experiments related to the work described here, optical photodepletion spectroscopy has been used to study Na3, Na4, and Na8.20 The coinage metal clusters have not been as extensively investigated, but are similar to alkali metal clusters and can be regarded as s1 electron clusters perturbed by the underlying d shell.21 Stability patterns found in the abundance spectra of alkali metal clusters have also been observed for singly and multiply charged silver clusters.22,23,24 A number of experiments have been performed on deposited silver clusters using various optical techniques25,26 and electron microscopy. 27 Gas phase silver clusters have been studied by photodetachment28,29 and photoelectron30,31 spectroscopy. Vibrational resolution has been obtained up to Ag332 and ionization potential brackets for a few clusters are already available.33 There is also some work on silver cluster reactivity34 and AgI derivatives.35 Clusters smaller than Ag10 have been modeled theoretically with high level calculations.36,37

However there is still a need for a consistent set of size specific measurements on the ionization potentials (IP) of these clusters – especially cold clusters rather than those generated from sputtering sources. This would be a step in the important direction of understanding bonding in more complicated transition metal systems. Some of the research that is presented here has been published recently38 but this account gives a more detailed description. In addition the following chapter describes a successful quantum mechanical model that explains the features observed in the ionization potentials of silver clusters. This model should also be applicable to other s1 metal clusters.

Mass Spectra

Figure 3.1 shows a typical mass spectrum of silver clusters obtained from the apparatus described in the previous chapter. The spectrum does not represent the underlying neutral cluster distribution which probably has far less structure.39 Instead the structure is a result of the ionization efficiency of individual clusters at this wavelength. Due mainly to the isotopic distribution of silver, peaks cannot be resolved beyond approximately Ag150, although structure is still visible in the mass spectra out to at least Ag400.38

Figure 3.1. Mass spectrum of silver clusters by photoionization using focused light at 235nm. The carrier gas is helium and the source is at room temperature. The ion abundance discontinuities correspond to changes in the ionization potentials. A 'shell' pattern exists that divides the peaks into sections: Ag9-Ag20, Ag21-Ag34, etc., as noted. A prominent even/odd pattern is also visible from Ag21-Ag43. (12-21-5.xlc) <full image>

Upon absorption of a photon it is possible that the cluster fragments. This has been observed for both silver cluster cations40 and anions28. In the determination of cluster ionization potentials, fragmentation is not likely to interfere for the following reasons. First, fragmentation below the IP would not effect the mass spectrum. Second, a fragmentation analysis that is based on simple kinetic arguments and ab initio binding energies shows that with the energy remaining after ionization (<2eV) fragmentation rapid enough (<1µs) to disturb the measurements is unlikely except for the smallest (n<7) clusters. (See the chapter on photofragmentation for more details.) Only fragmentation in competition with ionization would perturb the mass spectra and this is not expected to be significant near threshold.41

Cluster IP's were found to change if the clusters were generated with a liquid nitrogen temperature source rather than a source at room temperature. The ionization threshold became sharper at lower temperatures and the resulting IP was often higher. This is shown in the figures that follow. Under cold conditions the source could produce argon or nitrogen complexes suggesting that the internal temperature of these clusters is lower than those produced at room temperature. A sample mass spectrum is shown in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.2. Mass spectrum of silver clusters generated at liquid nitrogen source temperatures with 5% argon /He carrier gas. Ag9 easily forms complexes with the argon. These complexes are not seen for room temperature measurements. An even/odd effect in the pure clusters is also evident.<1004-08.tof><full image>

Ionization Potential Determination

To determine cluster ionization potentials, mass spectra were acquired over the energy range 208 to 255nm (5.96–4.86eV) at 1nm increments using the apparatus described previously. For each cluster size, graphs were made of the cluster signal as a function of the ionizing photon energy. These photoionization efficiency (PIE) curves were then used to estimate the cluster ionization potentials by drawing a straight line through the most linear portion of the curve and then noting its intercept with the x-axis. Example PIE curves for two clusters with long tails into the red end of the spectrum, Ag9 and Ag21, are shown in Figure 3.3. PIE curves were made for all clusters whose IP was within the observable range out to Ag100. There are definite variations in the length of the PIE curves with cluster size. Ag31 and Ag49, for example, have long tails. Some of these features are explained using a distorted sphere cluster model described in the next chapter.

Figure 3.3. Photoionization efficiency curves for Ag9 and Ag21. This is the intensity of the detected cluster signal versus ionization photon energy. (The curve for Ag21 has been shifted to the second baseline for visibility.) These are low temperature measurements. Arrows represent the linearization procedure and horizontal lines represent the assigned error bars for the ionization potential.<full image>

Figure 3.4 shows the result of the linearization procedure for both room temperature and cold source conditions. The cold cluster IP's are also tabulated in the appendix. There is more detail in the ionization potential pattern under cold source conditions since the 'thermal' tails become shorter and the curves steeper. The clusters Ag2, Ag4, Ag6, and Ag8 have IP's above the accessible range of the doubled dye laser.

Figure 3.4. Silver cluster vertical ionization potentials determined by linearizing photoionization efficiency curves. Values for both cold (liquid N2 source temperature) , and room temperature are shown. When significant, error bars are plotted for cold clusters. The smallest clusters are beyond the accessible energy range.<full image>

The error bars are approximately +/-0.15 eV. More emphasis is placed on the overall pattern than on the absolute values due to the arbitrary nature of linearizing the PIE curve to one IP value. Because of variation in the signal coming from the molecular beam and the long tails on some of these curves, the absolute value of the ionization potential assigned to the cluster has a significant uncertainty that was difficult to estimate. However the linearization procedure was applied consistently and the relative error between clusters is small. These relative errors are indicated in Figure 3.4 as error bars. Three sets of experiments were performed with the source at room temperature and one set with the source near liquid nitrogen temperature. The repeated experiments gave consistent results.

This work can be compared to the electron impact ionization of silver clusters, Ag2Ag36, which gives higher IP's than the photoionization measurements reported here.42 Another photoionization study of Ag3 however, gives a value in agreement with the results presented here.43 The reason for the discrepancy is uncertain but could be attributed to fragmentation that occurs with electron impact ionization or the higher efficiency of photoionization.

Discussion

A detailed discussion of the causes of the observed patterns is given in the next chapter, but some comments can be made about the relationship of these measurements to other transition metal clusters. The ionization potential of a metal sphere in a classical model has been extensively studied44 and found to be a simple function of the radius of the sphere R and the work function of the material,45

(3.1)

For comparison to s1 metal clusters, the radius can be approximated with R=rsN1/3 where N is the cluster nuclearity and rs is the radius of the volume of an electron in the bulk.44 Some improvement can be made to this approximation for small clusters by adding to the cluster radius an additional constant amount attributed to the electron 'spill-out'.44 If this classical IP term is subtracted from the measured IP's, the remaining intrinsic IP can be compared for various materials. Figure 3.5 makes this comparison with silver, sodium, and copper. Deviations from the properties of a classical metallic sphere could be attributed to a number of effects, for example (1) non-spherical structures and perturbations to the electron density caused by the ion cores, (2) variation in the atomic spacing with cluster size, (3) size dependent interaction with the underlying d-electrons and (4) effects related to the quantization of valence electronic energy levels. As will be shown in the next chapter, most if not all the observed features can be attributed to non-spherical structures and quantization of the valence electrons. Certain clusters that are considered to be spherical due to their closed-shell electronic structure are expected to approximate the behavior of metal spheres. These are sizes 8, 20, 34, 40, 58, 92, and 138.

 

Figure 3.5. "Intrinsic" components of the vertical ionization potentials for cold Agn from this work, Cun from [47,48,49], Nan from [50]. The similarities of the local features to these curves are visible. Spherical shell closings are noted in bold face. Values shown here correspond to IP-WF-½e2/(R+a). Work functions WF are from [49], and the electron spill-out radius a is from [44]. Further details are given in [38]. (File:ns.xls) <full image>

Figure 3.5 shows the considerable similarity among the three materials. Similarity between Cu and Ag clusters has also been noted on the basis of photoelectron spectroscopy.51 Interestingly, the existence of a prominent feature at 40 for Cu and not for Ag has also been observed in electron affinities.51 Although the d-electrons in copper are higher lying than those of silver the effect in the ionization potentials or electron affinities is not pronounced.30 Of the coinage metals, silver would be expected to be most like the alkali metals since it has the largest separation between the Fermi level and the d-band – approximately 3.5eV.51

The weaker patterns observed for sodium might be attributable to the weaker bonding in these clusters that results in less stable structures. The similarity of the sodium system to the coinage metal clusters suggests that the role of the underlying d-electrons is not a significant factor in the patterns observed. This agrees with ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) experiments that directly probe the d-electrons and find that there is a smooth progression of the d-band to that of the bulk band structure in this size range for Cu, Ag, and Au clusters.51 According to these experiments the bulk band structure is represented well by the 60 atom cluster although oscillatory features are still observable beyond that size.

To show that these patterns differ from other non-s1 metal systems, Figure 3.6 gives the ionization potentials of nickel and niobium clusters.52 53

Figure 3.6. Ionization potentials of two other types of transition metal clusters that are not s1 metals. These are only presented for comparison to Figures 3.4 and 3.5 to show that the patterns found for s1 metals are not common to all transition metals. Both sets of measurements are from Knickelbein, et. al.52,53 Note that for these clusters even–odd effects are not so strong and there is no evidence of the dramatic shell closings common to s1 metal clusters. There is some similarity between the sets in that IP's tend to decrease with size and features become less prominent as size increases. (File:ni-nb.xls)<full image>

Oscillations in the properties of small metal clusters has been a subject of interest for quite some time and the behavior of the IP's of small silver clusters had even been predicted on the basis of Hückel and CNDO calculations. The predictions published in 1978 and shown in Figure 3.7 are surprisingly similar to the experimental results obtained recently.

Figure 3.7. Comparison of experimental vertical IP's ( ) of silver clusters with CNDO calculations () of Baetzold[54] from 1978. Error bars are shown for IP's that have only been bracketed. Sources of experimental data are: Ag2 from [55] and [56], upper brackets from [33], and the remainder from this work. <full image>


18) M.L. Cohen, M.Y. Chou, W.D. Knight, W. A. de Heer J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 3141.

19) M.M. Kappes, Chem.Rev. 1988, 88, 369.

20) C.R.C. Wang, S. Pollack, D. Cameron, M.M. Kappes, J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 3787.

21) C. Pettiette, S. Yang, M. Craycraft, J. Conceicao, R. Laaksonen, O. Cheshnovsky and R. E. Smalley, J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 5377.

22) I. Katakuse, T. Ichihara, Y. Fujita, T. Matsuo, T. Sakurai, H. Matsuda, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, 1985, 67, 229.

23) O. Kandler, K. Athanassenas, O. Echt, D. Kreisle, T. Leisner and E. Recknagel, Z. Phys. D., 1991, 19, 151.

24) I. Rabin, C. Jackschath, W. Schulze, Z. Phys. D., 1991, 19, 153.

25) W.Harbich, S.Fedrigo, F.Meyer, D.M.Lindsay, J.Lignieres, J.C.Rivoal, and D.Kreisle J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 8535.

26) S. Federigo, W. Harbich, J. Buttet, Phys. Rev. B, 1993, 47, 10706; W. Harbich, S. Fedrigo, Meyer, Lindsay, Lignieres, Rivoal, Kreisle, J. Chem. Phys., 1990, 93, 8535.

27) P.Faust, M.Brandstattner, and A.Ding, Z. Phys. D, 1991, 21, 285.

28) L.-S. Zheng, C.M. Karner, P.J. Brucat, S.H. Yang, C.L. Pettiette, M.J. Craycraft and R.E. Smalley J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 85, 1681.

29) M. Seidl, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, M. Brack, J. Chem. Phys., 1991, 95, 1295.

30) J. Hoe, K. M. Ervin, W. C. Lineberger, J. Chem. Phys., 1990, 93, 6987.

31) G. Gantefoer, M. Gausa, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, H.O. Lutz G. Gantefoer, M. Gausa, K.-H. Meiwes-Broer, H.O. Lutz, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1990, 86, 2483.

32) P. Y. Cheng, M. A. Duncan, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1988, 152, 341.

33) K. LaiHing, P.Y. Cheng and M.A. Duncan, Z. Phys. D., 1989, 13, 161.

34) K.F.Willey, P.Y.Cheng, M.B.Bishop, M.A.Duncan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 1513.

35) C. K. Fagerquist, D. K Sensharma, T. S. Ahmadi, M. A. El-Sayed, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 6598.

36) V. Bonicic-Koutecky, L. Cespiva, P. Fantucci, J. Koutecky, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 7981.

37) R. Santamaria, I.G.Kaplan, O. Novaro, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 218, 395.

38) G. Alameddin, J. Hunter, D. Cameron, M. M. Kappes, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1992, 192, 122.

39) A. Kaldor, D.M. Cox, M.R. Zakin, Advances in Chemical Physics, Vol. 70. 'Evolution of size effects in chemical dynamics, Part 2,' eds. I. Prigogine and S.A. Rice, (Wiley, New York, 1988).

40) See chapter on photofragmentation.

41) O. Kandler, K. Athanassenas, O. Echt, D. Kreisle, T. Leisner, E. Recknagel, Z. Physik D, 1991, 19, 151.

42) C. Jackschath, I. Rabin and W. Schulze, Z. Phys. D., 1992, 22,

43) P. Y. Cheng, M. A. Duncan, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1988, 152, 341.

44) J.P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 6175.

45) G. Makov, A. Nitzan, and L.E. Brus, J. Chem. Phys., 1988, 88, 5076.

46) N. W. Ashcroft; Solid State Physics, Saunders: USA, 1976.

47) D.E. Powers, S.G. Hansen, M.E. Geusic, D.L. Michalopoulos and R.E. Smalley, J. Chem. Phys., 1983, 78, 2866.

48) M.B. Knickelbein, Chem. Phys. Letters, 1992, 192, 129.

49) R.C. Weast, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 66th Ed., (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1985/1986) pp. E-86, E-74.

50) E.C. Honea, M.L. Homer, J.L.Persson, R.L. Whetten, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1990, 171, 147; M. Homer, J. Persson, E. Honea and R. Whetten, Z. Phys. D., 1991, 22, 441.

51) K. J. Taylor, C. L. Pettiette-Hall, O. Cheshnovsky, R. E. Smalley, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 96, 3319.

52) M. Knickelbein, S. Yang, S. Riley, J. Chem. Phys., 1990, 93, 94.

53) M. Knickelbein, S. Yang, J. Chem. Phys., 1990, XX. no idea where to find!

54) R.C. Baetzold, J. Chem. Phys., 1978, 68, 555.

55) V. Beutel, G.L. Bhale, M. Kuhn, W. Demtröder, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1991, 185, 313.

56) R. Smalley referred to in: K. Balasubramanian, P. Y. Feng, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1989, 159, 452.